Infographic Template Galleries

Created with Fabric.js 1.4.5 Committee members volunteered 30+ hours over four separate daysthis summer. Volunteers drove from as far awayas Sierra Vista in order to participate. The committee did not grant more than a single letter grade increase. The committee deliberated over multiple years of school performance data in Review of 2014 A-F Letter Grade Appeals 24 44 >75% UNANIMOUS Decisions NON-Substantives X Time Commitment In-person appeals had 20 minutes to hear & discusswith Committee.There was no discussion limit for desktop reviews. 58 . B SUBSTANTIVEAppeals These groups contributed exceptional personnel & other resources to ensurefair, deliberative appeals for all LEAs. Center for Academic SuccessFowler Elementary School DistrictGlendale Union High School District Riverside Elementary School District Tonto Basin School DistrictAZ Charter Schools BoardSkyline Education SPECIAL THANKS! Salt River Pima Maricopa Community School PV Tribune reported a district middle school's successful letter grade appeal from D to C based on a disruption involving a school lock-down on the day of AIMS testing. LEAs chose to appear before the A-F committee in-person. 7 appeals of 2014 A-F letter grades. The committee granted The highest letter grade from a successful appeal was a addition to any information and documentation submitted. The inaugural year of the Expedited (desktop review) & NON-Expedited (in-person) appeals process was executed over the course of a three month period. ADE Accountability provided data and logistical support; ADE Legal Services (with help from the AZ Attorney General's Office) facilitated each committee meeting with ADE School Improvement lending their expertise. Schools with a substantive appeal were provided a copy of the rubric outlining the Committee's decision.
Create Your Free Infographic!